Two places, two cohorts: the Regenerative Design Lab in 2027

In 2027, we’re running two parallel cohorts of the Regenerative Design Lab for the first time.

RDL Hazel — Cohort 8 will return to Hazel Hill Wood near Salisbury, the home of the Lab since its early days.

RDL Beeches — Cohort 9 will be our first full programme at the Beeches in the Hope Valley, between Sheffield and Manchester — establishing a new home for the Lab in a landscape shaped by its natural and industrial heritage.

Both will run from spring to autumn 2027, bringing together up to 20 people for an eight-month exploration of what it means to put regenerative design into practice.

Explore RDL Hazel
Explore RDL Beeches

Eight months to experiment

The Regenerative Design Lab isn’t a conventional training course.

Participants bring an enquiry into the Lab and use the eight months to explore it in practice: taking action, paying attention to what happens, reflecting with others and deciding what to try next.

That’s important because working with complex systems takes time. The point isn’t simply to learn a set of regenerative design models. It’s to discover what happens when we try to use these ideas in real projects, organisations and lives.

And the enquiry often changes.

Some participants begin with a broad interest and gradually find the particular place where they can act. Others arrive with a specific technical or organisational challenge and discover that it connects to much bigger questions.

Recent participants have explored regenerative business strategy, timber house manufacturing, social infrastructure, circular construction, nature-based transport, engineering commons, organisational redesign, sustainable lighting, urban ecology — and how we choose to spend our time.

Learning to continue without us

The Lab combines residential gatherings, online workshops, individual experimentation and peer-led enquiry.

At the beginning, we provide more of the structure: introducing regenerative thinking, systems approaches and patterns and tools from the Pattern Book for Regenerative Design .

Over time, participants increasingly support one another, forming working groups around shared patterns, questions and interests.

That’s deliberate. Our ambition is to create a group that eventually doesn’t need us: practitioners with the confidence, relationships and capacity to continue experimenting and making change for themselves.

And after the eight months, participants join a growing RDL alumni network that now reaches across organisations and disciplines throughout the built environment.

Who is the Lab for?

We’re interested in people with the capacity to influence.

That doesn’t mean seniority. Previous cohorts have included people at very different stages of their careers, working across engineering, architecture, policy, education, sustainability and other parts of the built environment.

What matters is having somewhere to take the learning — a project, organisation, community or field of practice — and being willing to experiment, question your assumptions, learn with others and bring others with you.

Applications for both 2027 cohorts will open in November. Each is limited to 20 participants, and we’ll begin reviewing and shortlisting applications on a rolling basis from early December.

Find out about RDL Hazel — Cohort 8

Find out about RDL Beeches — Cohort 9

Or, if you’re new to the Lab, find out how the Regenerative Design Lab works

Upcoming train(ing) departures/ trains au départ

Train departures board

01/10 — Advanced Conceptual Design for Team Leaders

A special service calling at the key issues faced by team leaders when leading a design process, including building trust with your client, concept development in teams, managing conflict in design, and selling your designs to stakeholders.

05/11 — Introduction to Conceptual Design for Structural Engineers

Our regular express service introducing key frameworks for understanding conceptual design, calling at: the design brief, how to have ideas, how to have better ideas, and testing conceptual designs. This service connects with Advanced Conceptual Design, for which the next scheduled departure is in 2027.

05/11 — Net-Zero Structural Design

The return of our popular service, operated jointly with Will Arnold. Calling at the fundamental concepts, the hierarchy for net zero, decarbonising materials, working with a client brief, challenging thinking for net-zero designs, and the art of persuasion.

11/11 — Seeing the System: An Introduction to Regenerative Thinking

Calling at key definitions, the systems bookcase, the Living Systems Blueprint and Three Horizons. This service connects with the 2027 Regenerative Design Lab, due to be announced soon.

Passenger information: These train(ings) are for engineers and other humans from across the built environment sector.

Onboard services: As these departures are all online, no catering is provided.

All courses delivered by Constructivist for the IStructE, except Seeing the System, which is a Constructivist course.

Giving attention to the future

Screen shot showing post it notes arranged to look like a kaleidoscope

This month at the Regenerative Design Lab, Cohorts 6 and 7 both spent time on line imagining the future.

Using the Three Horizons model, we explored Horizon Three, not as a prediction tool but rather as a canvas for finding shared hopes for the future.

We structured the conversation using a Kalideascope — a tool central to our design teaching at Constructivist. And this makes sense because as designers we are constantly imaging the future. What changes here is that the principal ingredient to the process is our hopes for the future. 

A pattern I am spotting is how much common ground emerges in these sessions. Themes of connection, community, stewardship, making and different ways to find meaning emerged. And along side these, lots of examples of different ways that these futures exist in the present, there to be cultivated, encouraged, supported, connected up.

I think most valuable is that people didn’t leave with a single vision of the future but a long list of ideas for experiments, practices and actions. 

Over the coming months, the Lab will move into the next phase of the journey: designing experiment sand looking for ways to create transitions to that more hopeful future.

Outvestment versus investment

Diagram showing a self-reinforcing ambition loop between three stakeholders: Civic & Market Demand, Political Ambition & Policies, and Business & Finance Investment.

I was asked, Is regenerative design anti-investment?

No, but it does depend on the kind of investment.

In regenerative design we use living systems as a guide for how to create an economy that can thrive within ecological limits. 

Living systems create richness through the circulation of energy and materials within ecosystems.

Over time, ecosystems build complexity, resilience and abundance by cycling back in the majority of what is produced.

A regenerative economy should work in a similar way.

If investment yields returns in a place, and those returns are reinvested into that place — into its people, ecosystems, infrastructure and future capacity — then investment can become a mechanism for creating thriving.

But if investment primarily extracts value from one place to enrich somewhere else, the local system becomes depleted over time.

The clue is in the “in”.

If capital is genuinely investing into a place, then it can help build regenerative capacity.

But if it is mostly flowing out, perhaps what we are really looking at is outvestment.

Business, communities and government all have important roles to play in shaping these flows. Together they form an ambition loop (see diagram) that creates mutual benefit.

Because the deeper question is not simply:

‘Is investment happening?’

But:

‘Where does the bounty go?’

Change the book that is blocking the way

A five-shelf bookcase diagram labelled from bottom to top: Design, Operations, Mindsets, Goals, and Paradigm. Each shelf contains illustrated books or objects representing ideas or tools relevant to that level of a complex system.

Another frequently asked question at the talks I was involved with this week: what is the biggest factor blocking regenerative design.

I used the Systems Bookcase to help me answer this one.

In this model, the books on the bottom shelf represent the things we get to build.

But what we are and aren’t allowed to build is governed by the shelf above: operations.

  • Planning policy.
  • Supply chains.
  • Codes.
  • Assurance processes.
  • Risk models.

If the operating rules say no, the building never reaches the bottom shelf.

But those operational rules are themselves shaped by broader mindsets:

values, assumptions, ethics, beliefs about what matters and what is possible.

As we move up the bookcase, we encounter bigger and more influential forces shaping what design is permitted to become.

The point I made is that the key blocker will be different in every context.

In one place it may be insurance.

In another, procurement.

Elsewhere, culture, incentives, fear, or simply imagination.

The role of the regenerative designer is to identify the book that is blocking the change — and then work systematically to change it.

This work is guided by our collective hopes for the future, juxtaposed by the realities of the present. And it in this tension that we do our work. 

For every meaningful change we hope to make, there is usually a book in the way.

If there weren’t, the change would probably have happened already.

But books can be rewritten.

And how quickly that happens depends on the work we are collectively willing to do.

On the collective to-do list: hope

I gave three presentations this week at the Futurebuild and Footprint+ conferences in London.

The feedback I have been getting is striking: the idea that resonated most strongly across all three talks was the importance of reconnecting with hope.

Whether through a short visualisation exercise as part of a ten-minute talk, or a longer discussion about our shared visions for the built environment, the conversation seemed to change the atmosphere in the room.

It felt strangely radical.


A wave is not water.

It is an emergent phenomenon created when wind moves across the surface of water. The more aligned and sustained the movement of air, the larger the wave becomes.

Perhaps hope works in a similar way.

Most of us probably carry quiet desires for safety, for belonging, for beauty, for healing, for thriving.

But individually those desires can remain diffuse and disconnected.

When we share those desires, and discover our shared alignment, a wind of change begins to move through the group, and hope rises like a wave.

A sense of possibility emerges. 

Something that we can build with others.

But it only happens when we keep the shared conversations going about what we collectively aspire towards. 

Please leave this place as you found it

It wasn’t planned. It just sort of came out that way.

During the Q&A at a talk this week, someone asked:

“Isn’t regenerative design just the new name for sustainability?”

The goal of sustainability, I replied, is to meet our needs without compromising the needs of tomorrow.

And then this metaphor appeared:

“It’s a bit like those signs you get in bathrooms that say:

Please leave this place in the condition you found it.

Sustainability says: don’t mess it up.

But it doesn’t necessarily say anything about making things better.”

In fact, what we like to do is offset our mess in one place by tidying up somewhere else. 

As for toilets as for planet earth. 

Regenerative design is a fundamentally different proposition.

It’s not cleaning up after our actions.

Or merely reducing their impact.

It’s taking actions that in themselves make ecosystems, communities and places healthier and more capable of thriving.

Now imagine a bathroom that did that.

(Actually, it’s not such a daft question. Think of all those nutrients we flush away every day. But that’s material for another post.)

Newnham College Boathouse

Featured on the cover of this month’s Structural Engineer magazine is the new boathouse for Newnham College in Cambridge. 

The boathouse is a small timber structure designed to house rowing boats. Faced with conflicting constraints — a short-term lease, high design expectations and nearby tree roots — the team moved away from a more conventional steel solution and instead developed a locally sourced green timber structure designed for disassembly and reuse.

From a regenerative design perspective, what stood out to me was not simply the use of timber, but the wider system of relationships and decision-making around the building.

Here are a few headlines.

Constraints driving creativity

The idea that constraints drive creativity is not new.

What is striking here is how the constraints pushed the design team away from a Horizon One answer — resource-intensive materials, sourced from far away with little relationship to this place — towards a Horizon Two response that begins building local procurement, resource circulation and habitat sensitivity into the process itself.

So often constraints limit experimentation.

Here they helped create the conditions for it.

Sustainability high on the bookcase

Another striking aspect of the project is that sustainability appears to sit relatively high in the system.

The article notes that the idea of an eco-friendly boathouse “captured the imagination” of the college. That matters because once sustainability, experimentation and design quality become institutional goals — rather than bolt-on requirements — different decisions start to become possible lower down the Systems Bookcase.

Material possibilities grow. Procurement appetite shifts. Adaptability and local supply chains become easier to justify.

Change higher in the system changes what can emerge below.

Capacity to change

The building is designed for adaptability within a changing environment.

Screw pile foundations can be removed.

The timber frame can be dismantled and rebuilt elsewhere.

Connections can be adjusted as the timber seasons and matures.

This is not a building conceived as fixed until redundant.

It is designed to change over time.

Local capability and supply chains

The work also helped build local capability, including visual stress grading of timber at Rougham Estate.

The development of skills, confidence and supply-chain relationships becomes part of the design itself.

Recovering historical practices

Rather than inventing something entirely new, the project revives older forms of local timber construction, stewardship and repair culture that have largely been displaced by industrial standardisation.

Place-responsive design

The form responds to the surrounding boathouses, local materials, nearby trees and conservation setting. Inspiration even emerged from a walk in a local park. A partial move towards Continuous Place-Based Design.

Protective niche

Projects like this often emerge within protective niches in the wider construction system.

Institutions such as university colleges can sometimes sustain different priorities — legacy, experimentation and identity  — that allow alternative approaches to be tested before they become commercially normal elsewhere.

These niches matter. Like in ecosystems, protective niches create sheltered conditions in which new operational models, relationships and design approaches can develop enough confidence to spread more widely later on.

A useful H2 transition example

Overall, the project does not transform the wider construction system around it.

But it does prototype alternative ways of sourcing, building and thinking.

This is not simply a low-carbon building.

It is an example of Horizon Two transition-building: developing the operational capability, relationships and confidence needed to make different kinds of projects possible in future.

Book payments back online

Hello, it looks like we’ve been having some difficulty with purchases in our online store. Apologies if you have been trying to purchase the Pattern Book and have had no luck!

For now, you should be able to make payment using the Paypal button, and this will allow you to pay with a credit card or debit card even if you don’t want to set up a Paypal account.

We’ll hopefully be able to set up something more convenient soon.

In the meantime, thanks for your patience!